Mike Griffith
Candidate for Arvada City Council – At Large
2025 – Answered the following questions from APA:
2025 – Answered the following questions from APA:
Learn more about Mike Griffith at michaelforarvada.com
Griffith: As the lead consultant for Arvada’s first Transportation Systems Plan, I had numerous opportunities to collaborate with the City staff, the Mayor, City Councilmembers and the community on the nearly complete Climate Resilience and Sustainability Action Plan. Achieving 100% renewable energy by 2035 is an ambitious and commendable goal for any city. However, the real test lies in the day-to-day implementation. Below are key steps Arvada needs to take to move closer to this goal:
Griffith: The City has faced several setbacks in addressing the pressing issue of housing insecurity. Recently, I participated in the “Homelessness Forum” at the Standley Lake Library, where, with Jefferson County officials, we brainstormed about community messaging, regional partnerships, and funding strategies. I firmly believe in transparency, collaboration, and taking incremental steps toward our goals. Here are the challenges we must address to effectively tackle housing insecurity:
Transparency: We owe it to the communities affected by housing insecurity to be open and upfront about all plans and goals. I advocate for robust outreach and clear communication with community members to prevent them from feeling blindsided or excluded from the process. Good intentions can turn negative in the absence of information.
Partnership: As a member of the City Council, I will support collaboration with neighboring municipalities to address regional homelessness challenges, advocating for pooled resources and shared facilities. Currently, organization across the metro area is lacking, leading to urgent demands for immediate action from communities. Forming appropriate intergovernmental agreements will lead to more sustainable outcomes for everyone, especially those most affected by housing insecurity.
Incremental Approach (Crawl First): We must first prove that the City can manage and sustain an effort effectively. I recommend starting by immediately addressing the cold weather emergency shelter issue, which could be done in collaboration with Mission Arvada or another organization. If we cannot establish and maintain an emergency shelter that meets our current needs, larger initiatives such as a 24/7 shelter may struggle to succeed.
By focusing on these key areas, we can make meaningful progress in addressing housing insecurity in our city.
Griffith: I assume this question pertains to alternative transportation rather than recreation. While recreational walking and biking are great, to truly build a more walkable and bikeable Arvada, we need to focus on our transportation network.
Key Factors Affecting the Choice of Active Transportation:
Comfort & Convenience: These are the primary factors influencing active transportation adoptions over vehicular options. Currently, Arvada falls short in both areas for a few reasons:
Good news! Recent community and Transportation Plan surveys have revealed significant support for improved bike and ped facilities and more connections.
My Advocacy Plan If Elected to Council:
By focusing on these areas, we can make Arvada a leader in safe and fun active transportation.
Griffith: As the Chair of the Arvada Planning Commission, I have attended several meetings where it was evident that some members of the public were experiencing City Hall and formal public meetings for the first time. I have always made it a priority to meet with anyone interested in understanding how our city government functions and how they can effectively voice their opinions in public meetings.
In Council meetings, this would include spending time with community members before/after the meeting, offering to meet for coffee, or attending grassroots efforts and community meetings. Essentially, I strive to make myself available, transparent and accountable as an elected official to demystify the role City Councilors play in local government and to encourage public participation in the process from all community members. I will always be aware of and demand the City of Arvada continue to work towards making sure our community is welcoming to all who seek to live, work, learn and play here. I will be vigilant with respect to the fair and equitable treatment of diverse and marginalized communities, support fair policing, look for ways to improve economic advantages for marginalized communities, and for employers including the City of Arvada to further diversify their teams and employees. Arvada is for everyone!
Griffith: It is fantastic when community members formally present thoughtful resolutions to Council for adoption. I often hear compelling testimonies during public comment that could easily be transformed into citizen-initiated resolutions for Council consideration. I encourage more active participation from community members who have suggestions on resolutions. Additionally, I believe there is an opportunity for the Council to provide clarification on what resolutions entail and how they impact future decisions.
Griffith: Great question! Back in 2017, I recall a robust discussion around short-term rentals (STRs). Arvada was in a unique position as one of the only metro area cities that did not have a formal policy in place, and we were in the process of rewriting our Land Development Code (LDC). STR requirements are now included in the LDC.
At that time, I advocated for restricting STRs to “primary residence” only. This means you could use your personal property for an STR, but it had to be your primary residence, defined as where you live for at least six months and one day out of the year. This approach would address several challenges:
When I am on Council, I will continue to advocate for the above STR solutions. I believe I could work effectively with our current Council to address community concerns during future LDC updates. I recently spoke about this issue during a City Council meeting in public comment after the drive-by shooting in the Highland Place neighborhood.
Griffith: Arvada has an amazing parks system and a growing network of trails, with a diverse range of recreational amenities across rural, urban, and suburban areas. To improve the mental and physical health of our residents, future investments must focus on balancing affordability with infrastructure development.
Arvada is close to becoming a “bedroom community,” where most residents work elsewhere and most workers live elsewhere. This creates instability in our tax revenue, wears on our infrastructure, and affects the mental well-being of those forced to commute in and out of the city daily. With roughly 125,000 residents, Arvada only has water resources for an additional 18,000 to 20,000 people. Presently, many of those working in Arvada cannot afford to buy a home here. To address this, we must attract higher-paying jobs and increase affordable housing availability.
Improving traffic and road conditions is crucial, as peak AM/PM traffic is largely from commuters who would prefer to live and work in the same city. To enhance mental and physical health, we should invest in a broader range of housing options for service industry jobs, teachers, and first responders while also attracting high-paying tech sector jobs to the city. With limited space for new homes, prioritizing affordability and access to transit can help balance our infrastructure needs with our health goals.
Griffith: I agree that neighborhood schools strengthen our communities, and I am concerned about the number of Jefferson County Schools closing due to declining enrollment. While the Arvada City Council has no formal role in relation to management or oversight of Jeffco Schools, I am very supportive of the open and collaborative relationship the City of Arvada enjoys with Jeffco Public Schools and am interested in exploring how City Councilors can support better learning outcomes and equitable access to education within the city limits
One area of interest that could be a good starting point is coordinating bus stop locations with our city transportation team. An Arvada community member recently brought to my attention an issue with a Jeffco Public Schools bus pick-up location. Through my research I learned that the City of Arvada’s traffic team considered the pick-up and drop-off spot less than ideal from a safety perspective. While the City cannot dictate to the school district where school buses pick up and drop off, I believe we should advocate for better coordination between agencies, particularly when the safety of our children is at stake.
Griffith: Arvada is destined to change and grow, just like any other city. The key is to ensure that community feedback remains a core tenet throughout our development journey. The final iterations of the
projects mentioned above are far from settled, and the precise impact on our housing market and transportation infrastructure is uncertain. What is clear today is that the current housing market is out of reach for many of those working in Arvada, and our core transportation infrastructure citywide is generally rated at a D or worse. This presents a significant opportunity to address our current challenges, as many people want to do business, conduct research, and invest in Arvada. As a city, we need to be proactive and make tough, data-driven decisions to tackle these challenges universally.
Specific steps I would advocate for as one of seven council members include:
Encouraging Community Participation in Comprehensive Planning:
Supporting Our Housing Committee:
Compatibility and Community Outreach:
Promoting Smaller Footprint Homes:
By focusing on these areas, we can ensure that Arvada grows and develops in a way that addresses the needs of our community while maintaining its unique appeal.
Griffith: Parking in Olde Town has become a bizarre issue for our city, we need more – but we have plenty. On one hand, Olde Town is a popular destination, generating 9-10% of our sales tax revenue, so the more visitors, the better! On the other hand, circling for parking can be frustrating, especially for those with disabilities. Currently, the number of ADA (handicap) parking spaces is insufficient for the number of destinations, which is a significant concern.
Since the street closures began in mid-2020, there are fewer parking spaces available, but more pedestrian-friendly experiences have driven increased interest in visiting Olde Town. The City has implemented parking time limits and enforces them (I received a ticket recently for exceeding the 2-hour limit). The City is also discussing whether to implement paid street parking. All these efforts aim to make it easier to visit Olde Town and enjoy its amazing small businesses and amenities.
What is truly frustrating is that we have a nearly empty FREE parking structure built to accommodate Olde Town visitors and G-Line riders. The RTD garage was completed over 10 years ago, yet many people are still unaware that it offers free parking.
My position on parking in Olde Town is that the City first needs to assist the Business Improvement District with messaging and signage that informs people about the free parking in the garage and encourages them to use it for quick access to their favorite amenities. If the garage remains empty and people continue to circle for parking, it may be time to consider implementing paid meters to incentivize turnover.
Street parking is essential to local businesses for various reasons, and high turnover of parking spaces is generally beneficial for business foot traffic. However, it is crucial to strike a balance between what the public wants (more convenient parking) and what business owners need to survive (customers!). If paid parking meters deter people from visiting Olde Town, causing businesses to lose customers, that would be problematic. At this time, I believe paid parking for the lots is unnecessary.
Parking Priorities: